Academic Ethics
学术伦理
Declaration on Academic Ethics of the Journal
Academic research is a vital force driving knowledge advancement and social development, while academic ethics serves as the cornerstone for the healthy and orderly conduct of academic research. As an academic journal committed to rigorous scholarship and disseminating high-quality academic achievements, Global Cases and Practices in Vocational Education regards academic ethics as the lifeline of the journal's development and resolutely upholds the fairness, objectivity, and authenticity of academic research. Here, we solemnly declare our stance and requirements on academic ethics:
Resolutely oppose academic misconduct: The journal explicitly opposes all forms of academic misconduct, including but not limited to plagiarism, piracy, fabrication or alteration of data, multiple submissions, duplicate publication, improper authorship, false citation, etc. These behaviors seriously violate the basic principles of academic research, undermine the dignity and credibility of academia, and cause significant damage to the academic ecosystem. All submitted manuscripts will be screened for plagiarism using professional plagiarism detection software. The journal strictly prohibits plagiarism, duplicate submission, redundant publication, and other forms of academic misconduct. Once academic misconduct is discovered, the submission will be immediately rejected, and depending on the severity of the case, appropriate punitive measures may be taken, such as notifying relevant academic institutions and prohibiting the author from submitting again within a certain period.
Strictly adhere to academic norms: The journal requires all submitted papers to accurately cite the sources of others' research findings when referencing, respecting their intellectual property rights. At the same time, we encourage authors to fully elaborate on their research ideas, methods, and innovation points in their papers to promote academic exchange. For papers that do not comply with academic norms, we will request authors to make revisions until they meet the requirements.
Ensure the fairness of the review process: The journal has established a scientific, fair, and transparent review system to ensure that every submitted paper receives an objective and professional evaluation. During the review process, reviewers will strictly adhere to the principle of confidentiality and not disclose the paper content or review opinions. At the same time, we implement a double-blind review system, where authors and reviewers are unaware of each other's identities to avoid the influence of personal relationships on the review results. Review opinions will serve as an important basis for the editorial department's decision-making, and we respect the professional judgment of reviewers, but also comprehensively consider factors such as the innovation, academic value, and social significance of the paper to make the final decision.
Strengthen academic ethics education: The journal recognizes the importance of academic ethics education and will strengthen academic ethics education for authors, reviewers, and editorial staff through various means. We will regularly organize academic ethics training activities, invite experts and scholars to explain relevant knowledge and cases of academic ethics, and improve everyone's awareness of academic morality and normative awareness.
《职业教育全球案例与实践》期刊学术伦理声明
学术研究是推动知识进步与社会发展的核心动力，而学术道德则是保障学术研究健康有序开展的基石。作为致力于严谨治学、传播高质量学术成果的学术期刊，《职业教育全球案例与实践》将学术道德视为期刊发展的生命线，坚决维护学术研究的公正性、客观性与真实性。在此，我们郑重声明本刊对学术道德的立场与要求：
一、坚决抵制学术不端行为：本刊明确反对一切形式的学术不端行为，包括但不限于抄袭、剽窃、数据造假或篡改、一稿多投、重复发表、不当署名、虚假引用等。此类行为严重违背学术研究的基本原则，损害学术尊严与公信力，对学术生态造成重大破坏。本刊对所有投稿稿件使用专业查重软件进行抄袭检测。本刊严禁抄袭、一稿多投、重复发表及其他学术不端行为。一旦发现学术不端行为，投稿将立即被拒，幷根据情节严重程度采取相应惩戒措施，包括但不限于通报相关学术机构、禁止作者在一定期限内再次投稿。
二、严格恪守学术规范：本刊要求所有投稿在引用他人研究成果时，必须准确标注来源，尊重他人知识产权。同时，鼓励作者在论文中充分阐述研究思路、方法与创新点，以促进学术交流。对于不符合学术规范的论文，本刊将要求作者进行修改，直至达到要求为止。
三、保障审稿过程公正性：本刊已建立科学、公正、透明的审稿体系，确保每篇投稿均能得到客观、专业的评价。审稿过程中，审稿人将严格遵守保密原则，不泄露论文内容或审稿意见。同时，本刊实行双盲审稿制度，作者与审稿人互不知晓对方身份，以避免人际关系对审稿结果产生影响。审稿意见将作为编辑部决策的重要依据，本刊尊重审稿人的专业判断，同时也会综合考虑论文的创新性、学术价值及社会意义等因素，做出最终决定。
四、加强学术道德教育：本刊认识到学术道德教育的重要性，将通过多种途径加强对作者、审稿人及编辑人员的学术道德教育。本刊将定期组织学术道德培训活动，邀请专家学者讲解学术道德相关知识及案例，提升大家的学术道德意识与规范意识。
Editorial Board
Global Cases and Practices of Vocational Education
EduTech Press
February 24, 2026